Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 119% (2040MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700X +996%
10.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Dec 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1243 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.6 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
326.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.89 TFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.44 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
652.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
205W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Navi 10
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy