Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 290

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock930MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290 +409%
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Nov 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
40
512
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Hawaii
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy