Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs Intel H3C XG310

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (65W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (1550MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
H3C XG310 +150%
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Nov 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
DG1
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
123 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy