Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +112%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
0.448 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jul 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
128
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.60 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
448.0 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
G92
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
G92-270-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy