Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs Intel Arc A380

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs Intel Arc A380

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 120% (2050MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
Arc A380 +340%
4.198 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jun 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.397 TFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.198 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1050 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
DG2-128
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy