Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon RX 560 XT 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1226MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560 XT +361%
4.394 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Mar 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1074 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1226 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.23 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
137.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.394 TFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.394 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
274.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 LE1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy