Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs ATI FirePro V5800

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs ATI FirePro V5800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (74W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +71%
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
800
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
74W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Juniper
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy