Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD FirePro W4100

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +193%
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy