Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1030 GK107 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +133%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 1030 GK107
0.812 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Sep 2018
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.464 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
812.5 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.86 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GK107
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy