Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +253%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
1024
Shading Units
216
64
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT200
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy