Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA T400

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (1425MHz vs 925MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +73%
1.894 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
May 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU117
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy