Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

AMD Radeon R9 270 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1200 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 +2860%
2.368 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
80
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
74.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.368 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
17W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Curacao
GPU Name
Cedar
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy