Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270X vs AMD FirePro S9170

AMD Radeon R9 270X vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270X and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (180W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270X
2.688 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +94%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jul 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
84.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

180W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Curacao
GPU Name
Hawaii
Curacao XT (215-0848004)
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy