Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270X vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

AMD Radeon R9 270X vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270X and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 180W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270X +44%
2.688 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
May 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
84.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

180W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x SDI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Curacao
GPU Name
Cayman
Curacao XT (215-0848004)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy