Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270X vs NVIDIA PG506 242

AMD Radeon R9 270X vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270X and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1440MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 180W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270X
2.688 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +283%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1280
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
84.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

180W
TDP
165W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Curacao
GPU Name
GA100
Curacao XT (215-0848004)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy