Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI FireGL V7700

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI FireGL V7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 72.06GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +572%
3.344 TFLOPS
FireGL V7700
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Nov 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV670
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
RV670 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy