Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (950MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +1%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Mar 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1792
112
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
375W
550 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
Orthrus
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy