Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD FireStream 9350

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +65%
3.344 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jun 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
18
1792
Shading Units
1440
112
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cypress
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy