CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD FireStream 9350
AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD FireStream 9350
VS
AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
+65%
3.344 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280
VS
FireStream 9350
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Jun 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
18
1792
Shading Units
1440
112
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Cypress
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Board Design
200W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 OEM
2
AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon RX 550
3
AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750
4
AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE
5
AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
6
AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI Radeon HD 3470
7
AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GP104
8
AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600
9
AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100
10
AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon RX 455 OEM
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy