Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 768MB VRAM GeForce 8800 Ultra to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 103.7GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +764%
3.344 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 Ultra
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
May 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1080 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
103.7GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1792
Shading Units
128
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.69 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.17 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
171W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G80
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
G80-450-A3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy