Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs MTT S80

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs MTT S80

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 16GB VRAM MTT S80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Boost Clock933MHz
Lower TDP (200W vs 255W)
MTT S80 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
MTT S80 +330%
14.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Oct 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
1800 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1792
Shading Units
4096
112
TMUs
32
ROPs
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
768 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.4 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
255W
550 W
Suggested PSU
350 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
CPU 8Pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
ChunXiao
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
GCN 1.0
Architecture
MUSA
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
22 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.1
Shader Model

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy