Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (235W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +23%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
235W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy