Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (250W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +2%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
32
2048
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
274W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy