AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2
4.096 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+279%
15.56 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
950 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
375W
TDP
250W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Tahiti XTL
(215-0821065)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
22 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
