Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA P102 100

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA P102 100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (1683MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2
4.096 TFLOPS
P102 100 +162%
10.77 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2018
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
1582 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
25
2048
Shading Units
3200
128
TMUs
200
32
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
250W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GP102
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy