Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (190W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +283%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Sep 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
1792
Shading Units
4480
112
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GA100
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.5
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy