Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FireGL V5600

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FireGL V5600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
1672 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +1613%
3.29 TFLOPS
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Aug 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
3
1792
Shading Units
120
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
RV630
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
89W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy