Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +4012%
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
1
1792
Shading Units
80
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Cedar
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
17W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy