Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FirePro V3750

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +834%
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Sep 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
4
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
RV730
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
48W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy