Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Apr 2004
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
NV41
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy