Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FirePro V8750

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FirePro V8750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +174%
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro V8750
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jul 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
800
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
151W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
RV770
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy