Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FirePro 2270

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FirePro 2270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +3327%
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro 2270
0.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jan 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
80
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Cedar
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Cedar WS
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy