Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FirePro W4000

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +159%
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Aug 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
12
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy