Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FirePro W5100

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FirePro W5100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W5100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W5100 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +130%
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro W5100
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Mar 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Bonaire
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy