Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +692%
3.29 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Dec 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1792
Shading Units
192
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GT200B
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy