Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +358%
3.29 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Oct 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy