Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2321MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (53W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6400 +8%
3.565 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1923 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2321 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.27 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.130 TFLOPS
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.565 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
53W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Navi 24
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL (215-135000046)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy