Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +12333%
4.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Oct 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2560
Shading Units
16
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
31W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT218
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy