Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +12333%
4.849 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2560
Shading Units
16
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
18W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT218
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy