Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2736 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2 +7066%
5.733 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
May 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
80
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
M93
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy