Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5.733 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +39%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Mar 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
64
2816
Shading Units
4096
176
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
300W
900 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy