Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 500W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Apr 2006
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
-
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
NV43
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
110 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
30W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy