Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (1695MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1.613 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe +169%
4.339 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
885 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
768
Shading Units
1280
48
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
GA107
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
160 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy