Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM vs AMD FirePro D300

AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 380 OEM +51%
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1280
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Antigua
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Antigua PRO (215-0877000)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy