Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM vs AMD FirePro S7150

AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380 OEM and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 380 OEM
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +14%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2016
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Antigua
GPU Name
Tonga
Antigua PRO (215-0877000)
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy