Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs AMD FirePro M2000

AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs AMD FirePro M2000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 A375 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 A375 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 A375 +170%
1.299 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jul 2012
All-In-One
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
6
640
Shading Units
480
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

16.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
40.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1299 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Venus
GPU Name
Turks
Venus XTX (216-0846033)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
33W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy