Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD FirePro W4100

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY +1011%
7.168 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Aug 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
512
224
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy