Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +20380%
8.602 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jan 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
40
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
RV610
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy