Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +1336%
8.602 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
May 2015
Pirate Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Oland
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy