Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4016 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +10652%
8.602 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
80
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
17W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Cedar
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy