CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
VS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4016 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X
+10652%
8.602 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
VS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
80
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
275W
TDP
17W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
Cedar
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon PRO V710
2
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
3
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V8700
4
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
5
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4750
6
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT
7
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103
8
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro 2270
9
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FireMV 2250
10
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy