AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

VS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)

3200 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 10 months late

Boost Clock1665MHz

Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 FURY X +188%

8.602 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650

2.984 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 FURY X +44%

5173

GeForce GTX 1650

3590

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 FURY X +150%

30

GeForce GTX 1650

12

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 FURY X +132%

65

GeForce GTX 1650

28

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 FURY X +90%

80

GeForce GTX 1650

42

Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

GeForce GTX 1650

Graphics Card

Jun 2015

Release Date

Apr 2019

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1485 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1665 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

2001 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

4GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR5

4096bit

Memory Bus

128bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

128.1GB/s

Render Config

64

Compute Units

-

SM Count

14

4096

Shading Units

896

256

TMUs

56

64

ROPs

32

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

53.28 GPixel/s

268.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

93.24 GTexel/s

8.602 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

5.967 TFLOPS

8.602 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.984 TFLOPS

537.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W

TDP

75W

600 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

TU117

Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)

GPU Variant

TU117-300-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

12 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

4.7 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.3

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 10 GB

3

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

4

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

5

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V7800P

6

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM

7

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

8

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 6870

9

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

10

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Related News

1

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

2

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

3

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

4

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

5

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

6

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

7

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

8

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

9

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

10

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early